In
Schacter v Schacter, — N.Y.S.3d —-, 2017 WL 2366242, 2017 N.Y. Slip Op.
04372 (1st Dept., 2017) the Appellate Division held that Plaintiff’s
transient testimony {that a} piano was gifted to him throughout the marriage didn’t
suffice to beat the marital property presumption; thus, the courtroom correctly
deemed the piano marital property to be offered and the online proceeds divided
equally between the events (see DRL § 236[B][1][c]; Bernard v. Bernard, 126
AD3d 658, 659 [2d Dept 2015])
