Since COVID19 broke out, the BC Courts have heard quite a few pressing functions regarding parenting disputes. They’ve supplied tips on the way to co-parent throughout the pandemic. Custody points are usually resolved via the Provincial Courtroom and the Supreme Courtroom of BC. Listed here are the newest circumstances and commentary from our judges on parenting disputes and the way to resolve them throughout Coronavirus instances:

Case: The Mom Nurse Who Handled A COVID19 Affected person

CASE:  S.R. v. M.G., 2020 BCPC 57:


  • The mom is a nurse who handled a affected person with COVID19; she went into self-isolation for 14 days after treating the affected person.
  • The daddy runs a demolition firm which continues to function. He does go to his workplace once in a while.
  • The daddy started denying parenting time to the mom provided that she had are available contact with a COVID19 affected person.
  • The daddy was proposing video contact or in-person contact the place the kid would see the mom from her balcony.

Reasoning by the Choose 

The Courtroom said:

Now that the virus is spreading locally, we’re exposing accessing any providers, in any respect.  This consists of receiving the newspaper or mail, buying groceries, attending at a financial institution, or going for a stroll.

The decide supplied a variety of elements to contemplate in determing parenting points throughout COVID19:

  1. Whether or not the kid is at a increased danger of struggling the extra extreme penalties of the virus;
  2. Whether or not both celebration, or these of their family are at increased danger of struggling the extra extreme penalties of the virus;
  3. Every celebration’s publicity to the danger of contracting the virus;
  4.  Steps taken by every celebration to mitigate the danger of publicity;
  5. Within the bigger context, society’s want to keep up and entry sources locally, together with well being care and different ventures that present providers and revenue for households in a protected method over an prolonged time period.

The decide acknowledged that “a few of these employees are selecting to not return dwelling to their households once they stay with notably susceptible companions, kids and oldsters.”


The dad and mom have been ordered to make sure that the kid sees each dad and mom.

This case is attention-grabbing as a result of whereas the mom is perhaps seen as being in a “riskier-than-normal” occupation, merely grocery buying entails a stage of danger as nicely.

The chance that the mom experiences, which she has taken steps to mitigate, will not be a lot extra elevated than the danger the daddy additionally experiences. The chance to the mom is to not the purpose that the kid needs to be disadvantaged of parenting time together with her, given the advantages to the kid of time with each dad and mom.

The Touring Kids Case 

CASE: V.C.S. v. T.S., 2020 BCPC 60


  • The mom lives in Decrease Mainland. The daddy lives in Prince George.
  • Father has main residence of the kids and mom has parenting time with them throughout the holidays.
  • The daddy introduced the kids through automotive to the Decrease Mainland to go to the mom. When he tried to have the kids again to PG, the mom refused.
  • The mom reasoned that given the pandemic, it could be unsafe to move the kids as a result of they must get off the automotive, eat and use public washrooms which might enhance the probabilities of contracting COVID19.

Reasoning by the Choose 

The decide said that:

  1. Which might be no insurance policies or guidelines that stop individuals from having take out or drive via meals;
  2. There aren’t any insurance policies or guidelines that may stop individuals from utilizing public washrooms;
  3. Neither the kids nor the dad and mom had COVID19.
  4. The mom had no points with the daddy bringing the children down to go to her throughout the COVID19 however now was saying that it could be unsafe to return them to the daddy.


The kids have been ordered to journey again to the Prince George to be with the daddy.

The Courtroom said:

[21]        It’s evident that our well being authorities deem it protected for Canadians to proceed to enter grocery shops and gasoline stations which home public washrooms, supplied they follow preventative measures reminiscent of social distancing and washing their palms.  I’ve been supplied no proof as to why it’s notably unsafe for the kids to make use of public washrooms in these amenities when it’s not unsafe for different Canadians to take action.

The Mom with Psychological and Drug Points

CASE: N.J.B. v. S.F., 2020 BCPC 53


  • Earlier than COVID19, the mom’s parenting time with the kid was supervised by her relations;
  • The mom had a historical past of drug use, psychological well being issues and paranoia;
  • The daddy started proscribing mom’s entry to the kid noting that the mom has by no means been mentally secure, and won’t doubtless take correct measures to verify the kid will not be uncovered to the virus;
  • The daddy reasoned that the mom is unable to have a rational, logical thoughts and was placing youngster in danger throughout very dangerous instances.

Reasoning by the Choose 

The decide reasoned as follows:

  • The daddy should level out to particular, provable issues regarding COVID19 and the mom’s incapacity to handle the kid;
  • The mom’s historical past was nothing new, and her parenting time was supervised so these issues have been already addressed previous to COVID19;
  • Parenting preparations needs to be revered as a lot as doable throughout COVID19 except there are critical and actual issues to justify altering or limiting entry to kids.
  • The decide additionally quoted and endorsed some very helpful tips from specialists and a few Ontario circumstances regarding COVID19 which everybody ought to learn:

[28]        Dr. Elterman describes quite a lot of frequent parenting selections which will enhance dangers for each the kid and the group, and will type a part of selections concerning parenting preparations. They embody:

  1.  If a father or mother has had contact with an contaminated celebration, they need to disclose this instantly to the opposite father or mother.
  2.  If the father or mother is contaminated and even sick with signs or wanted to be examined for Covid-19, they need to not take the kid.
  3.  If the father or mother is in a house with older relations or buddies or with people who’re immune-compromised, the kid shouldn’t be in that dwelling.
  4. There needs to be no play dates and the kid shouldn’t be taken to household or social gatherings.
  5. If parenting time is to happen in a public place reminiscent of a group centre, a mall or a restaurant, then it needs to be suspended.
  6. If a supervisor is required and who will not be the partner of the father or mother and residing within the dwelling, then the parenting time needs to be suspended.
  7.  If both father or mother or anybody within the family is in an Important Service or nonetheless working with the general public, eg. docs, nurses, at a grocery store or pharmacy, flight attendant, and so forth.) then this could symbolize an elevated danger to the kid.

[29]        For my part, these are all affordable suggestions, and according to what I perceive to be the suggestions of public well being officers, right now. Though public well being tips will not be technically earlier than the Courtroom, in my opinion, and notably below the exigent and evolving circumstances that all of us presently face, I’m able to take judicial discover of these tips, which embody social distancing, frequent washing of palms and avoiding non-essential journey.

[30]        There are just a few written selections which have emerged in Ontario which have begun to handle the household points arising within the context of Covid-19. In Le v. Norris 2020 ONSC 1932, the Courtroom thought-about a case during which the mom was withholding parenting time for the daddy opposite to a Courtroom Order attributable to her issues about Covid-19 transmission. The Courtroom ordered compliance with the parenting Order and in doing so mentioned the next:

[11]  As well as, one thing direct should be mentioned about Le’s worries and nervousness concerning the COVID-19 well being disaster. These issues, this Courtroom sympathizes with and understands and might even relate to (however my relative privileged existence, far faraway from the toils of these engaged on the entrance strains to provide and deal with me and my neighbours). However, on the identical time, these issues will be addressed via accountable adherence to the present Courtroom Order.

[12]  This Courtroom orders that the December 5, 2019 Order of Kurz J., with regard to entry between Norris and the kid C., shall be complied with in all respects. This Courtroom orders, additional, that the police are hereby approved to implement the mentioned Order, and the one made herein.

[13]  Lastly, what do I imply by “accountable adherence to the present Courtroom Order”? I imply being sensible and having some fundamental frequent sense. Bodily distancing measures should be revered. The events should do no matter they’ll to make sure that neither of them nor the kid, C., contracts COVID-19. Each precautionary measure really helpful by governments and well being authorities in Ontario and Canada should be taken by each events and, with their assist, by C. Neither celebration shall do something that can expose him/herself or C. to an elevated danger of contracting the virus.

[31]        In Ribeiro v. Wright 2020 ONSC 1829, the Courtroom mentioned the next:

[21]  We’ll take care of COVID-19 parenting points on a case-by-case foundation.

  1. The father or mother initiating an pressing movement on this matter will probably be required to offer particular proof or examples of conduct or plans by the opposite father or mother that are inconsistent with COVID-19 protocols.
  2. The father or mother responding to such an pressing movement will probably be required to offer particular and absolute reassurance that COVID-19 security measures will probably be meticulously adhered to – together with social distancing; use of disinfectants; compliance with public security directives; and so forth.
  3. Each dad and mom will probably be required to offer very particular and real looking time-sharing proposals which totally handle all COVID-19 concerns, in a child-focused method.
  4. Judges will doubtless take judicial discover of the truth that social distancing is now changing into each commonplace and accepted, given the variety of public amenities which have now been closed. It is a excellent time for each custodial and entry dad and mom to spend time with their youngster at dwelling.

[23]  Judges received’t want convincing that COVID-19 is extraordinarily critical, and that significant precautions are required to guard kids and households. We all know there’s an issue. What we’re on the lookout for is real looking options. We will probably be seeking to see if dad and mom have made good religion efforts to speak; to point out mutual respect; and to provide you with artistic and real looking proposals which show each parental perception and COVID-19 consciousness.


The decide ordered the mom’s parenting time to be resumed.

Abstract and Takeaway

The brief abstract of all the above is that point with each dad and mom are necessary. And that, to some extent, practically everyone seems to be partaking in actions which have some stage of danger.


  • parenting preparations require transportation or driving to a different group,
  • one of many dad and mom is in a riskier occupation,
  • one of many dad and mom has a monitor file of earlier irrational behaviour, and so forth

These issues are inadequate to withhold parenting time. It’s usually anticipated that parenting orders or preparations will probably be obeyed and that kids will proceed to see each dad and mom in these instances, absent very extraordinary and concrete points.  Courts are taking the view that point with dad and mom continues to be useful and youngsters are entitled to it.

If in case you have any issues regarding parenting and COVID19 period, name us at 604-974-9529 or get in touch. 





Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here