Since COVID19 broke out, the BC Courts have heard quite a few pressing functions referring to parenting disputes. They’ve supplied pointers on the way to co-parent throughout the pandemic. Custody points are usually resolved by means of the Provincial Court docket and the Supreme Court docket of BC. Listed below are the newest circumstances and commentary from our judges on parenting disputes and the way to resolve them throughout Coronavirus instances:

Case: The Mom Nurse Who Handled A COVID19 Affected person

CASE:  S.R. v. M.G., 2020 BCPC 57:


  • The mom is a nurse who handled a affected person with COVID19; she went into self-isolation for 14 days after treating the affected person.
  • The daddy runs a demolition firm which continues to function. He does go to his workplace once in a while.
  • The daddy started denying parenting time to the mom provided that she had are available in contact with a COVID19 affected person.
  • The daddy was proposing video contact or in-person contact the place the kid would see the mom from her balcony.

Reasoning by the Choose 

The Court docket acknowledged:

Now that the virus is spreading in the neighborhood, we’re exposing accessing any companies, in anyway.  This consists of receiving the newspaper or mail, buying groceries, attending at a financial institution, or going for a stroll.

The choose supplied quite a few elements to contemplate in determing parenting points throughout COVID19:

  1. Whether or not the kid is at a larger threat of struggling the extra extreme penalties of the virus;
  2. Whether or not both occasion, or these of their family are at larger threat of struggling the extra extreme penalties of the virus;
  3. Every occasion’s publicity to the danger of contracting the virus;
  4.  Steps taken by every occasion to mitigate the danger of publicity;
  5. Within the bigger context, society’s want to take care of and entry assets in the neighborhood, together with well being care and different ventures that present companies and earnings for households in a protected method over an prolonged time frame.

The choose acknowledged that “a few of these employees are selecting to not return residence to their households once they dwell with notably susceptible companions, kids and fogeys.”


The mother and father have been ordered to make sure that the kid sees each mother and father.

This case is attention-grabbing as a result of whereas the mom may be seen as being in a “riskier-than-normal” occupation, merely grocery purchasing entails a degree of threat as effectively.

The chance that the mom experiences, which she has taken steps to mitigate, will not be a lot extra elevated than the danger the daddy additionally experiences. The chance to the mom is to not the purpose that the kid must be disadvantaged of parenting time along with her, given the advantages to the kid of time with each mother and father.

The Touring Youngsters Case 

CASE: V.C.S. v. T.S., 2020 BCPC 60


  • The mom lives in Decrease Mainland. The daddy lives in Prince George.
  • Father has major residence of the youngsters and mom has parenting time with them throughout the holidays.
  • The daddy introduced the youngsters through automobile to the Decrease Mainland to go to the mom. When he tried to have the youngsters again to PG, the mom refused.
  • The mom reasoned that given the pandemic, it could be unsafe to move the youngsters as a result of they must get off the automobile, eat and use public washrooms which might improve the possibilities of contracting COVID19.

Reasoning by the Choose 

The choose acknowledged that:

  1. Which might be no insurance policies or guidelines that forestall folks from having take out or drive by means of meals;
  2. There aren’t any insurance policies or guidelines that might forestall folks from utilizing public washrooms;
  3. Neither the youngsters nor the mother and father had COVID19.
  4. The mom had no points with the daddy bringing the youngsters down to go to her throughout the COVID19 however now was saying that it could be unsafe to return them to the daddy.

End result 

The kids have been ordered to journey again to the Prince George to be with the daddy.

The Court docket acknowledged:

[21]        It’s evident that our well being authorities deem it protected for Canadians to proceed to enter grocery shops and fuel stations which home public washrooms, supplied they observe preventative measures reminiscent of social distancing and washing their palms.  I’ve been supplied no proof as to why it’s notably unsafe for the youngsters to make use of public washrooms in these services when it isn’t unsafe for different Canadians to take action.

The Mom with Psychological and Drug Points

CASE: N.J.B. v. S.F., 2020 BCPC 53


  • Earlier than COVID19, the mom’s parenting time with the kid was supervised by her relations;
  • The mom had a historical past of drug use, psychological well being considerations and paranoia;
  • The daddy started limiting mom’s entry to the kid noting that the mom has by no means been mentally steady, and won’t seemingly take correct measures to ensure the kid will not be uncovered to the virus;
  • The daddy reasoned that the mom is unable to have a rational, logical thoughts and was placing baby in danger throughout very dangerous instances.

Reasoning by the Choose 

The choose reasoned as follows:

  • The daddy should level out to particular, provable considerations referring to COVID19 and the mom’s incapacity to handle the kid;
  • The mom’s historical past was nothing new, and her parenting time was supervised so these considerations have been already addressed previous to COVID19;
  • Parenting preparations must be revered as a lot as doable throughout COVID19 until there are severe and actual considerations to justify altering or limiting entry to kids.
  • The choose additionally quoted and endorsed some very helpful pointers from consultants and a few Ontario circumstances referring to COVID19 which everybody ought to learn:

[28]        Dr. Elterman describes a wide range of frequent parenting selections that will improve dangers for each the kid and the group, and will kind a part of selections concerning parenting preparations. They embrace:

  1.  If a dad or mum has had contact with an contaminated occasion, they need to disclose this instantly to the opposite dad or mum.
  2.  If the dad or mum is contaminated and even in poor health with signs or wanted to be examined for Covid-19, they need to not take the kid.
  3.  If the dad or mum is in a house with older relations or pals or with people who’re immune-compromised, the kid shouldn’t be in that residence.
  4. There must be no play dates and the kid shouldn’t be taken to household or social gatherings.
  5. If parenting time is to happen in a public place reminiscent of a group centre, a mall or a restaurant, then it must be suspended.
  6. If a supervisor is required and who will not be the partner of the dad or mum and residing within the residence, then the parenting time must be suspended.
  7.  If both dad or mum or anybody within the family is in an Important Service or nonetheless working with the general public, eg. docs, nurses, at a grocery store or pharmacy, flight attendant, and so forth.) then this may signify an elevated threat to the kid.

[29]        In my opinion, these are all affordable suggestions, and in line with what I perceive to be the suggestions of public well being officers, right now. Though public well being pointers are usually not technically earlier than the Court docket, in my opinion, and notably beneath the exigent and evolving circumstances that all of us at present face, I’m able to take judicial discover of these pointers, which embrace social distancing, frequent washing of palms and avoiding non-essential journey.

[30]        There are just a few written selections which have emerged in Ontario which have begun to handle the household points arising within the context of Covid-19. In Le v. Norris 2020 ONSC 1932, the Court docket thought-about a case through which the mom was withholding parenting time for the daddy opposite to a Court docket Order because of her considerations about Covid-19 transmission. The Court docket ordered compliance with the parenting Order and in doing so mentioned the next:

[11]  As well as, one thing direct have to be mentioned about Le’s worries and nervousness in regards to the COVID-19 well being disaster. These considerations, this Court docket sympathizes with and understands and might even relate to (however my relative privileged existence, far faraway from the toils of these engaged on the entrance traces to produce and deal with me and my neighbours). However, on the similar time, these considerations will be addressed by means of accountable adherence to the prevailing Court docket Order.

[12]  This Court docket orders that the December 5, 2019 Order of Kurz J., with regard to entry between Norris and the kid C., shall be complied with in all respects. This Court docket orders, additional, that the police are hereby licensed to implement the mentioned Order, and the one made herein.

[13]  Lastly, what do I imply by “accountable adherence to the prevailing Court docket Order”? I imply being sensible and having some primary frequent sense. Bodily distancing measures have to be revered. The events should do no matter they will to make sure that neither of them nor the kid, C., contracts COVID-19. Each precautionary measure really useful by governments and well being authorities in Ontario and Canada have to be taken by each events and, with their assist, by C. Neither occasion shall do something that can expose him/herself or C. to an elevated threat of contracting the virus.

[31]        In Ribeiro v. Wright 2020 ONSC 1829, the Court docket mentioned the next:

[21]  We’ll take care of COVID-19 parenting points on a case-by-case foundation.

  1. The dad or mum initiating an pressing movement on this matter might be required to offer particular proof or examples of conduct or plans by the opposite dad or mum that are inconsistent with COVID-19 protocols.
  2. The dad or mum responding to such an pressing movement might be required to offer particular and absolute reassurance that COVID-19 security measures might be meticulously adhered to – together with social distancing; use of disinfectants; compliance with public security directives; and so forth.
  3. Each mother and father might be required to offer very particular and real looking time-sharing proposals which absolutely tackle all COVID-19 issues, in a child-focused method.
  4. Judges will seemingly take judicial discover of the truth that social distancing is now changing into each commonplace and accepted, given the variety of public services which have now been closed. It is a superb time for each custodial and entry mother and father to spend time with their baby at residence.

[23]  Judges gained’t want convincing that COVID-19 is extraordinarily severe, and that significant precautions are required to guard kids and households. We all know there’s an issue. What we’re on the lookout for is real looking options. We might be seeking to see if mother and father have made good religion efforts to speak; to point out mutual respect; and to give you inventive and real looking proposals which exhibit each parental perception and COVID-19 consciousness.

End result

The choose ordered the mom’s parenting time to be resumed.

Abstract and Takeaway

The brief abstract of the entire above is that point with each mother and father are essential. And that, to a point, almost everyone seems to be partaking in actions which have some degree of threat.


  • parenting preparations require transportation or driving to a different group,
  • one of many mother and father is in a riskier occupation,
  • one of many mother and father has a monitor document of earlier irrational behaviour, and so forth

These considerations are inadequate to withhold parenting time. It’s usually anticipated that parenting orders or preparations might be obeyed and that kids will proceed to see each mother and father in these instances, absent very extraordinary and concrete points.  Courts are taking the view that point with mother and father continues to be helpful and kids are entitled to it.

In case you have any considerations referring to parenting and COVID19 period, name us at 604-974-9529 or get in touch. 





Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here